Click on this image to go to the home page for the Happiness On Line web site

SEX

Drugs&Drink

Moral Drift

Child Abuse

Happiness Home Page

Second Section

Separate Search Page
or search below


Purpose

Infectious Greed

Free Books

Write To Karl Loren Table Of Contents
Role Model

Look For Truth

Signs Of Improvement

You Can Help!

Care For Yourself

Laws Make Certain Forms Of Sex A Crime!

Issues
State by State
About Lambda
Library
Events
Join
Search
Jobs

 
RELATED LINKS

Criminal Law

Sodomy Law Map

Resources 05/11/2001

State-by-State Sodomy Law Update
 

As recently as the early 1960s, all 50 states had some sort of criminal law that outlawed consensual sodomy. Today, fewer than half the states do. Lambda’s work, throughout our 25-year history, has always emphasized legal challenges and advocacy against such laws -- because of both their direct and indirect harm to gay people. Our efforts will not stop until all of United States are “free.”

Generally, these sodomy laws criminalize oral or anal sex, between consenting adults including in the privacy of their homes. Direct criminal enforcement of these laws against private activity between consenting adults is rare, but even without enforcement such laws stigmatize certain forms of sexuality. The laws are used by police and prosecutors to support “solicitation” arrests, often in the context of sting operations that target gay male cruising places. The laws very commonly function as an irrational excuse for denying lesbians and gay men basic civil rights and equal treatment.

While most sodomy laws, as written, apply to everyone -- regardless of marital status, gender or sexual orientation -- they are disproportionately invoked against lesbians and gay men. (Some states (see list below) have made this discriminatory focus explicit.) This differential application occurs despite the facts that (a) those forms of sexuality are common among both heterosexual and gay couples, and (b) conversely, a lesbian or gay couple with a sexual relationship is not necessarily violating such a law. In the minds of many, however, sodomy laws uniquely brand lesbians and gay men as “criminals.”

In Florida, Georgia, and Texas, for example, sodomy statutes have been used to deny employment to gay job applicants. In North Carolina and Virginia, such laws have provided a basis for denying child custody and visitation rights to lesbian mothers or gay fathers. Indeed, sodomy laws have been put forward as a purported rationale against enacting civil rights laws that bar discrimination based on sexual orientation. In this way, the sodomy laws very broadly subject lesbians and gay men to second-class citizenship.

In the most infamous civil rights case involving a gay plaintiff, the Supreme Court upheld Georgia’s sodomy law against a federal right to privacy challenge in Bowers v. Hardwick. That decision has been widely criticized, however, and since then the state's highest court overturned that law. State appellate courts in Montana, Kentucky, and Tennessee also have interpreted their state constitutions to prohibit the criminalization of consensual, private oral or anal sex between adults. Moreover, Romer v. Evans opens the door for new, federal equal protection challenges to these pernicious enactments.

NOTES:

1 In June 2000, a Texas court of appeals overturned the "Homosexual Conduct" law. The deadline to file an appeal in Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, in which Lambda is lead counsel, has not yet passed.

2 In Louisiana, two seperate courts have found that the Louisiana sodomy law violates the state constitution's privacy guarantee. State v. Smith was appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court. It is likely State v. Legal will also be appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court.

3 In Arizona on May 8, 2001, Gov. Jane Hull signed into law a bill that repeals a ban on sodomy, oral sex and cohabitation.

4 In Arkansas on March 23, 2001, a court overturned the state's anti-gay sodomy law in response to a challenge from seven lesbian and gay state residents, represented by Lambda in Picado v. Jegley.

5 In Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley, No. 88-815820 CZ (Mich. Cir. Ct. July 9, 1990) a trial court ruled Michigan’s sodomy law unconstitutional under the state constitution. Because the attorney general did not appeal that ruling, Michigan law makes it binding on all state prosecutors, at least absent future litigation that might attempt to resuscitate the sodomy statute.

6 In 1999, a Missouri appeals court, in State v. Cogshell, has construed the sodomy statute not to apply to consensual sexual relations.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



This is the Karl Loren Happiness On Line Web Site  Karl Promises To Answer Any Personal Message, Personally.

Copyright: (c) 2001 Karl Loren. All Rights Reserved.