Click on this image to go to the home page for the Happiness On Line web site

SEX

Drugs&Drink

Moral Drift

Child Abuse

Happiness Home Page

Second Section

Separate Search Page
or search below


Purpose

Infectious Greed

Free Books

Write To Karl Loren Table Of Contents
Role Model

Look For Truth

Signs Of Improvement

You Can Help!

Care For Yourself


In Anxious Era, Schools Subject Volunteers to Greater Scrutiny

Source

The Wall Street Journal  

August 26, 2002

PAGE ONE

In Anxious Era, Schools Subject Volunteers to Greater Scrutiny

By SUSAN WARREN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
 

HALTOM CITY, Texas -- Diane DeSoto is a typical PTA mom: eager to help and plugged in to her children's lives. But when her daughter's kindergarten teacher asked if she would lend a hand with school activities, she had to make an embarrassing confession.

"I'd love to, but I can't," Ms. DeSoto said. "I wouldn't pass the background check."

 Should schools check the criminal backgrounds of parents who volunteer? Participate in the Question of the Day1.
 
 

Ms. DeSoto, 41 years old, was convicted of felony amphetamine possession in 1992, which disqualifies her from volunteering in her suburban school district near Fort Worth and in a growing number of other places around the country. Sept. 11, the Catholic priest-molestation scandal and a series of lurid child kidnappings are combining to stoke parents' anxiety as the new school year gears up. And that's prompting more and more districts to require parents to undergo criminal-background checks before being allowed to accompany their children on field trips or help out with holiday parties.

Criminal convictions, and sometimes merely an arrest, can lead to a ban on volunteering. Parents who refuse to provide their Social Security or driver's license number can also be barred.

Supporters of the policies, including many parents, see the checks as another way to protect children's safety. But opponents worry about branding parents unfit even after they have paid their legal penalty for crimes or when their offenses -- such as bouncing checks or shoplifting -- don't suggest a threat to student safety. "Once we start down the path of morally judging who can and cannot go into their child's classroom, we are treading on dangerous ground," says Barbara Clark, president of Nevada's Parent Teacher Association. She has helped fend off a proposed law in that state that would require background checks.

Ms. DeSoto doesn't make any excuses. "I was a drug addict," she says. In 1992, she was sentenced to probation, which she violated in early 1996 by again using amphetamines. That landed her in prison for more than three years.

[Portrait]

After her release in April 2000, she set about trying to repair the damage she had done to her two daughters, now 13 and 7. She says she has been drug-free since 1996. She works selling wooden playground sets and is active in a local church dedicated to helping families of former inmates. She hopes that by turning around her life, she can steer her children away from the mistakes she made.

But she is saddened and frustrated that she can't participate more in her children's school activities. "I want to be that mom in my child's life," she says, especially when her younger daughter pleads with her to go on the class field trip like the other moms. "It's just really devastating," says Ms. DeSoto, who now uses a different married name but asks that it not be printed. "I know I have a past, but you have to understand, some people do change."

Increasingly, schools aren't willing to take that chance. Ronald Stephens, executive director of the National School Safety Center, estimates about half of the nation's 15,500 public-school districts have background checks for volunteers. The center provides safety training to teachers and administrators.

As the volunteer coordinator for Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools in North Carolina, Patricia Robson has screened 17,000 volunteers since the district began checking backgrounds in January 2001. Parents who are flagged must come in and explain the circumstances of every arrest, charge or conviction, providing documentation on how it was resolved. "I have people in my office crying," says Ms. Robson. "It's something that happened in their life a while ago. They're very sorry that it happened, and they've made restitution."

Awkward Explanation

Her district is mainly looking for felonies like assaults, sex crimes or child abuse. But more than 100 parents were asked in the first six months to explain bounced checks, which show up as fraud, Ms. Robson says. Many shoplifting cases have also surfaced. One parent had the awkward task of explaining an arrest stemming from a soured extramarital affair, although the charges had been dropped. That parent was allowed to volunteer. Ms. Robson has formally turned down only about a dozen people as volunteers, but she says several hundred dropped their volunteer pursuits after getting her call reporting that a check had turned up a problem.

Background checks have been common for years for teachers. Private youth groups such as the Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts also screen volunteers. Now schools are requiring would-be volunteers to fill out forms describing their backgrounds. The schools typically then send the paperwork to state police, who check for any criminal history. In addition to identifying potential dangers, this routine demonstrates a school district's concern for safety and may help it fend off possible lawsuits if students are harmed by a wayward volunteer, educators say.

In January, the Houston Independent School District, which serves 200,000 children, began screening its volunteers. "You must act to over-prevent -- even at the cost of the relationship between parents and the school district," says Cathy Mincberg, the district's chief business officer.

Michelle Alabaster, a Broward County, Fla., mother of two children, had been a school volunteer since 1989. She had helped in the school office, mentored students and won a Volunteer of the Year award in 1999.

But a background check in 2000 uncovered a weapons offense. During a 1995 visit to her dying brother in Texas, who was talking about suicide, Ms. Alabaster says she found two handguns in his apartment. She decided she should take them away. She says she packed the weapons in her suitcase, intending to give them to a police-officer friend. Following her airline's guidance on the legal way to transport the weapons, she checked the bag containing the guns. But because she was running late, she says, an airline employee gave the bag back and told her to check it at the gate. The gun was discovered at an airport-security checkpoint, and she was arrested.

She pleaded no contest in 1995 to unlawfully carrying a weapon in an airport. She received "deferred adjudication," meaning the conviction wouldn't be recorded if she served her probation without incident, which she has done, according to court records.

Ms. Alabaster says she provided all of the documentation school officials asked for, but they still banned her. When she got the news, she says, "I burst into tears. I was devastated. I had devoted my life to these children. I thought I was making a difference."

Weapons charges are especially sensitive for schools, explains Bill Tegtman, a Broward school official who participated in the Alabaster review. "Deferred adjudication does not make it go away like it never happened. We've heard as many stories as you can imagine."

The process can be traumatic even when parents are ultimately cleared to volunteer. When Coos Bay, Ore., elementary school principal David Laird called a parent to talk about a misdemeanor conviction, "it was like I dropped a bombshell," he says. The principal checked references and decided to let the parent volunteer. Although he sees the checks as a necessary safeguard, Mr. Laird says, "if we all got caught for what we did when we were younger, we'd all have criminal records."

At a time when numerous studies stress the importance of parental involvement in schools, opponents of background checks worry they will scare parents away. One lapse in judgment "doesn't mean they haven't turned out to be good, dedicated parents," says Donna Riani, who helped reverse a background-check policy in her suburban Chicago school district during her tenure on the school board in the mid-1990s.

Enforcing background checks can be especially hard on urban schools with low-income, minority populations, says James Hammonds, who served as a parent representative on his local Chicago school-advisory council until his term expired this summer. A father of four, Mr. Hammonds, who is African-American, says his volunteer efforts focused on getting other minority parents involved in the schools. That's a tough task with inner-city parents, many of whom are struggling economically and lack role models of involved parenting. Background checks and the prospect of government prying into their lives give some minority parents "one more reason not to get involved," he says.

Privacy concerns are stopping some parents from volunteering. Angie Choiniere, a past PTA president in Charlotte, N.C., was barred from chaperoning students overnight when she refused to provide her Social Security number for a background check. Ms. Choiniere says she worried about who would get access to information she gave to school officials. Earlier, she had been a victim of "identity theft" when her credit-card information was stolen at a restaurant, she says. The thief was able to obtain her Social Security number and order new credit cards in her name.

Not a Panacea

Some skeptics point out that checks don't always protect children, since many child molesters don't have criminal records. In June, Andy J. Sconzo of San Antonio, Texas, was sentenced to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to indecency with a child for fondling young school friends of his daughter. Before his arrest in February 2001, Mr. Sconzo had passed a background check administered by the San Antonio schools. He had also coached swimming and soccer in the area and was a youth leader at his church.

The screening "did not help us, unfortunately," says Steve Henry, a school-district spokesman. Since Mr. Sconzo's arrest, the district has tightened its screening rules, barring any volunteers who have anything questionable on their record. For example, any drug offense, no matter how old, and "you're out," says Mr. Henry.

Deborah Nicholas of Dallas says she has worked hard to get her life in order after she was convicted of murdering her husband in 1980, when she was 23. He was abusive, drunk, and threatening her with a gun, she says. "I grabbed the gun as he was reaching for me," she says. She was paroled after 5 1/2 years in prison and remarried.

Times were rocky for a while, but she says she straightened out her life, became deeply involved in church and now ministers to current and former prison inmates through a volunteer program. She also has an eight-year-old son.

Fortunately, says Ms. Nicholas, her job as a real-estate agent allows her to pay for a private church-based school that allows her to be fully involved as a volunteer and field-trip driver. "Most people there know me and know all about me," she says.

Ms. Nicholas says she understands a school's hesitation to allow parents with criminal records around other kids. But for her own son, she says, "it's very, very important for him to know that I'm there. I'm trying to give him a different life."

Write to Susan Warren at susan.warren@wsj.com 2

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1030319990800888675.djm,00.html

 
Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) mailto:susan.warren@wsj.com

Updated August 26, 2002 12:20 a.m. EDT





 

Copyright 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your Subscription agreement and Copyright laws.

For information about subscribing go to http://www.wsj.com
 
 
The Wall Street Journal
 
 
Home    
(Reply-Only Folder) -  Should schools check the criminal bac...  
 
From:  WSJ.com Editors  Aug-23 3:22 pm 
To:  ALL  Poll (1 of 9) 
  2534.1 
Should schools check the criminal backgrounds of parents who volunteer?
           
 
 
 
  Yes, for major offenses
155 votes (35%)
  Yes, for any criminal past
203 votes (46%)
  No
83 votes (19%)
 
 
441 people have voted so far

 
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  Guest  8:53 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors  Poll (2 of 9) 
  2534.2 in reply to 2534.1 
It's so hard to get competent parents to volunteer for anything related to school that a background check (performed by a private agency?) could scare even more people away, not because they have anything to hide but simply because they might not want anything of a personal nature in the hands of school officials.

What happens if the most competent volunteer in the community did something reckless and stupid when in his teens? Who makes the decision? What happens to the children of a potential volunteer who gets turned down? What happens to the relationship between the school and the turned-down volunteer? What will this person (people) tell other potential volunteers? This is potentially a giant bag of snakes.

The relationship between today's inadequate schools, the inadequate bureaucrats who run them and parents is already strained. Don't ask. Don't tell.

David Bowman.
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  Guest  8:57 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors  Poll (3 of 9) 
  2534.3 in reply to 2534.1 
Americans really should think hard about the justice system (and arguably the health care and education systems and possibly all the public services save the military) in the Land of the Free. The imprisonment rate is up to ten (yes, 10) times that in Europe and Canada. Silly misbehaviours such as weed possession are crimes for which visible minorities are disproportionately imprisoned. Any parent who wishes to help out at school picnics should be left alone by clipboard-wielding, rule book-toting, lawyer-fearing zealots.
 
Robert Soly
Laval, Quebec, Canada
 
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  9:16 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors  Poll (4 of 9) 
  2534.4 in reply to 2534.1 
Protecting the feelings and reputation of s, pales in comparison to protecting the lives of children. The pain of a screening process that may involve uncomfortable discussions or even the exclusion of a suitable volunteer, cannot be compared to the pain of regret.

How will Barbara Clark resolve the angst she will feel when one of Nevada's young s is found buried in the backyard of an individual who could not have passed the type of background check that she has helped to defeat?

In todays culture, rife with child ography on the Internet, this issue should be a no brainer.

Thank goodness for folks like Patricia Robson. To be sure, her job has had many unpleasent moments. It is courageous people like Patricia that make communities a safer place for children.

 

Greg Bassett
Grants Pass, OR
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  10:15 am 
To:  ALL  Poll (5 of 9) 
  2534.5 in reply to 2534.2 
Records of a minor are usually sealed, so doing something stupid in your teens doesn't count. Once you're past 18 and you do something stupid, it shows whether or not you have good judgment as an adult. I want to know about major offenses (sex, violence, and drug related) before you volunteer in a school. For both the sake of the teachers and the kids.
Marcus Hadden
NY, NY
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  10:17 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors unread  Poll (6 of 9) 
  2534.6 in reply to 2534.1 
The article is perfect timing. We moved from NY to FL a year ago. My daughter just started Kindergarten and seems to be adjusting nicely. I read your article and I called my wife afterwards. She was in awe as she herself was thinking the other day about who would check her if she volunteered to drive kids on field trips. She was concerned about who would drive her daughter or take care of the kids in class when the teacher had to do errands or take a day off. My wife faced this same dilema and in fact we talked about how as parents can we check our own teachers and assistants who nurture our children. I'm not saying to ban everyone for any offenses since there is no such thing as PERFECTION on earth. But I also believe that kids mirror adults and kids fear adults who have problems. In your article you talk about a guy who abused his kid's friends yet he passed a background check. It would ease any parents mind that teachers, school officials and parent/guardians passed background checks which is the first step in getting clarity on security clearances. It's not perfect but it's a step in the right direction. These are just some of the checks and balances that can assist our communities in making sure we take care of our kids and provide for a secured environment. No place is safe. No place is perfect. But we can create a place where there is a balance of security, learning and growth. It begins with communication, school officials, educational leaders and parents being involved and working together to reach a common goal: a secured place for learning!
M.Masa
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  11:11 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors unread  Poll (7 of 9) 
  2534.7 in reply to 2534.1 
Yes, check, but if the offense was non-violent and not an offense against children, AND the person shows that they are now good citizens/parents, they should be forgiven and be allowed the privileges of any other parent.
Joyce Langley
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  11:18 am 
To:  WSJ.com Editors unread  Poll (8 of 9) 
  2534.8 in reply to 2534.1 
The Ultimate goals is to make classrooms as safe as possible for our children. Teachers and administrators in the public schools are seeking ways to make the limited dollars they receive go as far as possible. Having a parent volunteer work one on one with a child who needs extra help has been done in many schools....but it would only take ONE instance of child abuse or worse abduction to end this. We screen teacher candidates and do criminal background checks-- why should a volunteer be exempt? The only drawback is that the school systems must incur the expense of these background checks. Parents must realize that in today's society ALL schools must be in a "state of alert" at all times in order to protect our children.
K. Roehm
Wauchula, FL
 
   

 

 
From:  Guest  1:51 pm 
To:  WSJ.com Editors unread  Poll (9 of 9) 
  2534.9 in reply to 2534.1 
It is not very smart to ask for volunteers and then subject them to an intrusive search. I am sure that it will discourage all or most potential volunteers, even if they know that their past is squeekie clean. It certainly would discourage me.
Mike Kerner
Lenexa, KS
 
   

 


 

Signed in as: Guest
 
 
 
Copyright © 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
DowJones

 


This is the Karl Loren Happiness On Line Web Site  Karl Promises To Answer Any Personal Message, Personally.

Copyright: (c) 2001 Karl Loren. All Rights Reserved.