You are invited to read this and then send a thoughtful comment to Karl, for publishing on this site. Click Here for comments sent thus far. This article was written and published before the November elections in the US. The Democrat victory guaranteed more violence in Iraq as the Iraquis saw they had not much more time left to use their own violence against fellow-citizens == staking out their claims to future spoils.

The proof of the end of hope in Iraq is HERE in a WSJ article dated November 23, 2006.

As the violence deepens, one thing unites Iraqi politicians across the Sunni-Shia divide: Growing concern about increasing talk in Washington of a possible withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Mr. Mashadani, the outspoken Sunni Parliament speaker, suggests the U.S. should have some 500,000 troops in Iraq to truly make a difference. Mr. Sagheer, the Shiite lawmaker, also says the U.S. should stay and keep training Iraqi security forces. Source

This article has been "RE-SUGGESTED" in Karl's Monday Letter dated December 11, 2006.

The News Continues Bad -- Until The Solution Below Is Acknowledged

Here is the danger facing civilization just now. A kid in the street, some Muslim with faith, but poor and at least disaffected from Western life -- he gets knocked on the head -- from behind.

He is drugged, hypnotized, given skillful implants by a psychiatrist (Bin Laden's number two guy is a Psychiatrist -- trained in Egypt). He wakes up in the arms of a bevy of beautiful willing "virgins" drinks the honey and spice of Paradise and learns that he IS in Paradise.

(You haven't heard that Ayman al-Zawahiri is a psychiatrist? Not surprising, the media does not give the full story and psychiatry is one of the main tools of those who "create" terrorists. Click here for the ABC News Story that was up and public, then disappeared!) Sure, he had other medical specialties, but his psychiatric skills are what are leading the terrorist movement on the planet just now. You think that spreading nuclear technology is worrisome? Think again -- the "secrets" of mind control have been well known to the CIA and others, for decades -- it's just that MORE people are now using them in ways that we don't like.

That Muslim kid could have had a "Sunday School Morality and love for people!" But, he learns soon, full of the earlier hypnosis and electrical implants (well proven to be effective) that he can return to Paradise immediately when and as he murders a target who has been assigned to him -- and dies during the murder. More importantly he has been implanted with the willingness and desire to kill!

(You've heard that hypnosis can't make you do anything that is against your moral code? That is old data. When you combine hypnosis with drugs to make it "deeper" and then add injury, such as electric shock treatment that leaves no marks, you can and do create a "Manchurian Candidate" and the spy agencies all know how to do this. Click here for the proof of that. This material was available to me on the web, but has since disappeared -- my web may be one of the only places you can find it!)

With thousands of them fanning out across the globe, with box cutters and dirty bombs, there is no security in concept that can keep them away from your daughter, or the school, or the subway. It will happen and there is no defense -- except? War?

War hasn't solved violence -- war can suppress a nation into slavery for a few decades or even centuries, but man has a way of "coming back" to freedom, or the search for freedom -- unless, of course, he is drugged out of his gourd!

On his way "up" from slavery, if he gets enough help, he passes through a phase of such anger and hatred that he is quite willing to kill those who are now "helping" him. That type of "help" is the Coca Cola Remedy -- Western Culture with its sex and sugar poured onto what might have been a good kid, but now becomes a terrorist.

The knowledge of how to implant evil intentions has been known, yes, but it is getting more wide-spread. The solution is also known, but little yet appreciated. The start of that solution is on THIS page.

So, the Assassins Guild ruled the known world for many years and are on their way again.

Who can now say, with any straight face, that it is a certainty that we "will win" in Iraq.

But, sending in the Army to win a war, leaving them in place to build roads and schools, using them to train Tribe X to fight Tribe Y, as necessary, doesn't lead to lasting peace. We could be spending years and wasting billions on a total reconstruction job in Iraq -- there must be a less expensive and more effective way of bring peace to that country.

Our kids, fighting in Iraq? Why do they have such high moral when the people back home are so negative? The kids in Iraq are DOING SOMETHIG ABOUT IT. The folks back home are watching TV and complaining. Those who DO are generally always better off than those who eat junk food and serve as the spectators who fill up the numbing hours of TV watching.

Yes, those who want to cut and run are pushing more violence to our homeland, but those who want to bomb them out of existence won't do anything except kill them all -- leaving us safe for a while -- until their children grow up and get to Paradise -- and pick up a bomb on the way out -- toward our home.

That danger was put forth in a prominent Indian newspaper, and it puts the modern danger quite logically -- HERE.

North Korea did not carry out its nuclear test to acquire weapons and deter an external nuclear threat. It faces no such threat. The intention behind the test was to acquire nuclear weapons as an insurance against the United States's attempts to carry out a regime change in North Korea using economic pressure.

. . .

Sixty years of nuclear theology developed by western strategists has given no insights into dealing with a blackmailing nuclear state in a world where terrorist non-state actors pose threats to civil societies of major democratic nations. But North Korea is not the originator of this strategy, Pakistan is. The battle over North Korean proliferation was lost by the US in its dealings with Musharraf. (Source)

The problem is NOT that our leaders don't see these dangers. No, the problem is that they see the failure of traditional warfare to fight people who want to die. I believe our leaders are scared to death about a threat of world-chaos that they don't have a solution to -- so they put on a brave front and "hope."

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have proposed anything useful.

There is no public leader looking for a better solution -- at least none has been proposed. A better solution would have to resolve not only the violence but the hatred and despair among those who turn to violence in hope of finding paradise.

For thousands of years man has sought peace through violence - it has not worked. We are now facing an enemy to civilization that is, in fact, very similar to a similar enemy of some hundreds of years ago. Then it was an overwhelming force of violence and evil for a long period of history -- READ ABOUT THAT HERE. A more accurate description of these ancient powers is HERE.

Today it faces us again and few are the government leaders who recognize the danger. Those who recognize the danger fear there is no answer. Those who think there is an answer, so far, are delusional.

President Bush, for instance, came into town proclaiming that his Foreign Policy was spreading democracy -- that changed after only two years to "acknowledging traditional stability" of government which favors dictators who are not called dictators and are now welcome as honored guests in the White House.

Wrapped in the language of the Bush administration's campaign to encourage democracy around the world and explained under the rubric of "transformational diplomacy," Rice laid out plans to reposition diplomatic resources from Europe and Washington to emerging power centers in Asia, Africa, South America and the Middle East, and to reorganize the administration of foreign aid by creating the post of director of foreign assistance, whose occupant would coordinate aid programs that are currently dispersed among several agencies and bring them into line with Washington's broad foreign policy goals.

Rice's announcements culminate a major revision of Washington's overall geostrategy that has been in the making since 2004 when the failures of the Iraq intervention exposed the limitations of U.S. military capabilities and threw into question the unilateralist doctrine outlined in the administration's 2002 National Security Strategy. Through the second half of 2004, Washington appeared to function in a policy void, as the neoconservative faction in the security establishment, which had already edged out the traditional multilateralists, lost influence and no competing tendency was strong enough to take its place.

That picture changed in 2005 when Rice became secretary of state and moved to fill the policy vacuum by implementing her realist vision based on classical balance of power. (Source)

This Policy, less than a year NEW, is obviously failing -- North Korea is not about to accept any "democratization" along with the billions of dollars in aid it will demand in its blackmail.

I'm an old guy - at 75 -- I can remember a happier day. The world is full of ruin and the media exaggerates it. Check out the bad news about real estate prices (source)

Public morality may have been just as bad 50 years ago? But, if so, it was better hidden! Now adays the corruption bubbles over at every turn of a newspaper page:

The Justice Department also charged Dr. Crawford with conflict of interest, because he chaired an FDA working group on obesity issues while he owned shares in PepsiCo and Sysco, companies which had business that could be affected by the panel's findings. (Source)

Moral corruption is most often publicized in large entities -=- goverments and large commercial firms. Moral corruption also is to be found in the rich "middle class" in Iran -- those who owe their ill-gotten gains to the powers that deny freedom to the citizens. These rich share in the moral corruption, but they get well paid in money for their corruption -- so money is usually the root of corruption. Here is an article from the Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2006:

I live in a country where alcohol is officially banned, but where the art of homemade spirits has reached new heights. Sharing my astonishment about the cocktail book with some friends with better connections to the Islamist regime, they explained the government has a silent pact with the educated and affluent in Iran's big cities, who render politics unto Caesar, provided that Caesar keeps his nose out of their liquor cabinets. (Source)

There are some FORTY countries with some semblance of nuclear programs -- can this situation get worse!

Who will demand some change -- some improvement in this situation?

Is there any hope?

Our society is now divided into many different opinions on these and other vital questions -- where do you stand on this scale of awareness of not only the problem but the solution?

The Administration will disguise their complete capitulation for fear of making the changes occur even faster. But the change is seen in many circles, if not the public yet:

Today states are still important, but they function in a world shaped less by military power than by complex political processes involving international institutions, multinational corporations, citizens' groups and, indeed, fundamentalists and terrorists--in short, global politics. (Source)

These are new confusions groping for leader's acceptance as truth. Will we need to suffer more of these foolish gropings

There is a better solution -- on these pages. We need only start with the neighbor next door, or a group in Gaza, and spread the common sense book of choices and moral values which is offered on THESE pages and which has already been distributed to more than 15,000,000 people on earth. It will take many more of these books in circulation, but it is now well-proven that in areas where this book is distributed crime and violence are reduced.

There is no one else even making that claim with any semblance of proof.

Public benefit programs based on implementation and use of the free book I offer on this web site have been awarded nearly 150 official proclamations and recognitions from city, state and national governments around the world as a result of the benefits it has brought to their citizens and communities. (source)

Are you ready to lend your hand to the creation of peace on our planet? Start by clicking on the top of any of these pages for the "Free Books" and I'll send you two of them, no charge, and you take a look.

You can also click on this link to go to another web site where my page will introduce you to this concept.

I think you'll find that these Books offer a practical way of improving morality and ethics, and reducing the reliance on violence and war -- everywhere they are distributed.

Take a hand at saving your own family from the nuclear blackmail, not from Korea, but from some terrorist group that gets its dirty bomb from Korea.

Korea has US over the barrel -- as does Indonesia. And we think that giving more countries the atomic power would be helpful??

Mutual Assured Destruction was the way we lived for many years -- when only a few countries could pull that trigger.

Now it is NOT a country, but a crazy guy with a beard, living in some cave -- HE can pull the trigger -- and if not him, any of thousands of others who are ANXIOUS to die in the act of pulling that trigger.

It is time that the common man started doing something about this -- if the governments won't even announce that they are lost without a solution and would welcome good tools to do their duty of protecting their citizens.

It wasn't too long ago that I was talking to my friends about a "just war" and now I don't think we have one in Iraq, if there is any possibility of one anywhere.

So, I now agree that the boom In morality MUST come -- there have to be more people, like me, who see the futility of using force against Korea, and who figure that our giving billions of dollars of aid to that dictator is not a good use of taxpayer money -- and it still won't bring peace -- paying extortion never works either.

It is the nature of very poor people, who are also immoral, to use a gun to get all your money -- and waste what they get. Is this to be our future -- buying off the terrorists until we are impoverished and enslaved??

So,the campaign I will be pushing is that "You have no choice now -- you must look for, find and use SOME method that has SOME evidence of effectiveness to reduce violence and crime."

Karl Loren

Comments From Another

Comment From A Muslim

The Baker Commission Report